Santa Fe attorney allowed to leave jail to enter alcohol treatment

Posted: March 16, 2011 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

Cindy Turcotte (Courtesy of the Santa Fe County jail)

Santa Fe attorney Cindy Turcotte was released from jail Tuesday night (6:03 p.m. according to jail records) after a judge signed off on allowing her to enter a 40-day inpatient treatment program in Colorado for alcohol abuse.

Turcotte, according to a contempt order drafted by State District Judge Sheri A. Raphaelson last week, showed up drunk to a court hearing on Thursday in Tierra Amarilla. The judge, who is on a recent string of reminding area attorneys who is boss in her courtroom, sentenced Turcotte to 7 days in jail. Turcotte served five of those days before being allowed to leave to attend rehab in another state.

But what do you think about the punishment for essentially showing up to work drunk? Was it too much? Was is it an appropriate message to send?

Never in a million years would I suggest showing up to work drunk is OK, especially when you’re an attorney who was supposed to be working a plea agreement hearing for a client (which Cindy was scheduled to be doing when this happened).

But lets break down what is alleged to have happened here. She showed up to work intoxicated and got put in jail without bond for seven days (yes, released two days early, but only with the promise she will be attending a 40-day out-of-state treatment program).

Would that fly anywhere else?

Again, I’m not condoning what is alleged to have happened here. I say alleged because Turcotte has made no public comment and has essentially said through her attorney, John Day, she’s grateful for the opportunity to go to rehab. Putting the attorney in jail to sober up, maybe even spend the night and then getting the ball rolling on Turcotte being sanctioned or maybe even disbarred is one thing. A seven-day jail sentence for being drunk (not driving drunk, mind you, although I’m not sure how she got to TA for the hearing) seems awfully excessive. And if there was a history here of this happening, do something about it before slapping her with a 7-day jail sentence seems like the better option.

Even violent offenders with probation violations related to being drunk while out of custody or showing up to their own court hearing drunk usually get no more than a 2-day remand to jail for the violation, if that.

Am I wrong? Doesn’t this seem a little harsh and borderline excessive?

Again, here is the link to an article in The New Mexican about Turcotte’s release from jail to enter a treatment program:


  1. I agree with you. It’s amazing that people still see alcoholism as a moral issues, when it’s not. I am glad, however, that Cindy is getting the help she needs. If that’s what it take, in the long run, it will pay off. Perhpas this will be her bottom….and it is excessive.

    Please take a look at these alcoholism facts, its alarming!!!!!

    • james blaker says:

      I think its awsome that she got to see what it felt like for me for 19 months and two days she did a poor job on my case ad well I can prove there is no eveidence but still let me hang I glad. The truth about her has come out

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s